Poster Presentation Clinical Oncology Society of Australia Annual Scientific Meeting 2022

Measuring cognitive dysfunction in Glioblastoma (GBM) – an audit of current clinical practice in the use of formal cognitive assessments at Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital​ (#420)

Ek Leone Oh 1 , Chia Len 1 , Caroline Zabczyk 1 , Anne Long 1
  1. Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairment among patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) is clinically recognised but limited data exists to define the scope of the problem.(1) Cognitive dysfunction may be the first manifestation of tumour recurrence with significant impact on patients’ quality-of-life.(1-4) Recognising neurocognitive dysfunction is important in assessing decision-making capacity and cognitive rehabilitation may be beneficial for GBM patients.(5-7) Cognitive impairment is not routinely assessed with no standard to assess the degree of cognitive impairment amongst GBM patients.(8)

Objective

Assess the current levels of cognitive assessments that are occurring in clinical practice by reviewing the number and types of cognitive assessment performed in this patient group. Results may inform future recommendations for cognitive assessment in patient care. 

Methods

We undertook a retrospective study and identified patients above the age of 18 with newly diagnosed GBM, who were reviewed by the medical oncology team in Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (SCGH) from September 2016 to January 2018. Patients with established impairment or unsuitable for further chemotherapy were excluded. We reviewed patients’ electronic and physical medical records to evaluate if any cognitive assessment was performed over a 24-month period.

Results

Of the 51 patients identified, 36 patients were included in this audit based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. 8 of the 36 patients had formal cognitive assessments completed within 24 months of diagnosis. The Mini-Mental State Examination was the most used cognitive assessment tool. Of 11 patients noted to have cognitive decline, only one patient underwent formal cognitive assessment.

Conclusions

Our audit confirms that cognitive assessment is not routine in the assessment of patients with GBM with only a minority of patients undergoing any form of cognitive testing. This concerningly included patients who were documented to have demonstrated signs of cognitive decline.

  1. Bergo E, Lombardi G, Guglieri I, Capovilla E, Pambuku A, Zagone V, et al. Neurocognitive functions and health related quality of life in glioblastoma patients: a concise review of the literature. European Journal of Cancer Care.
  2. Armstrong C.L., Goldstein B., Shera D., Ledakis G.E. & Tallent E.M. (2003) The predictive value of longitudinal neuropsychologic assessment in the early detection of brain tumor recurrence. Cancer 97, 649–656.
  3. Meyers C.A. & Hess K.R. (2003) Multifaceted end points in brain tumor clinical trials: cognitive deterioration precedes MRI progression. Neuro‐Oncology 5, 89–95.
  4. Li J., Bentzen S.M., Li J., et al: Relationship between neurocognitive function and quality of life after whole-brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastasis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 71: pp. 64-70
  5. Locke D.E., Cerhan J.H., Wu W., et al: Cognitive rehabilitation and problem-solving to improve quality of life of patients with primary brain tumors: a pilot study. J Support Oncol 2008; 6: pp. 383-391
  6. Maschio M., Dinapoli L., Fabi A., et al: Cognitive rehabilitation training in patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy and cognitive deficits: a pilot study. J Neurooncol 2015; 125: pp. 419-426
  7. Hassler M.R., Elandt K., Preusser M., et al: Neurocognitive training in patients with high-grade glioma: a pilot study. J Neurooncol 2010; 97: pp. 109-11
  8. Flechl B, Sax C, Ackerl M, Crevenna R, Woehrer A, Hainfellner J, et al. The course of quality of life and neurocognition in newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma. Radiotherapy and oncology.